The Agatha Christie Project Update

Thursday, October 16, 2025

I know, I know, it's been forever since I've added anything to The Agatha Christie Project page!

The truth is that I just haven't been very motivated to put my bookish thoughts online for quite a few years now. But I am going to try and get the ball rolling on this project again, this time, without an end date. I hate deadlines in all aspects of my life, so we'll just not have one for this project and I'll get books reviewed as I get around to them.

One thing is for sure, though, I am saving up to add to my Christie collection of hardbacks. I've realized that I only want to collect books that I love so the bookcases need to be weeded. But for those beloved authors, I will go out of my way to buy special copies of their books. With designs that I love and that I feel add to the mystique and adventure promised within the pages. Christie is one of those authors, and I am enjoying the experience of adding pretty editions to my sadly lacking bookshelf bearing her name.

When do you read Agatha Christie? Do you have a season when you want to just reach for her books, or is it an all-year-round thing?

Read More

No, fans have not turned on Keira Knightley

 

Photo Credit: Keira Knightley at Netflix The Woman in Cabin 10 London News Photo 
 
First of all, can we just admire how beautiful Keira Knightley still is at 40. There is such grace and poise in how she is aging, so much sparkle, and I hope and pray that other actresses feel like they can follow suit. That it is okay to enter different seasons of your life and to allow your body and your face to change. If Helen Mirren can do it (here's an interview with Helen on Allure), so can every other actress out there, and it would be such a healthy thing for society rather than having so many women absolutely run from natural aging.

Back to the topic at hand. 

In case you haven't heard, Keira Knightley was hijacked during an interview about her latest film, where the interviewer grilled her about her knowledge of JK Rowling's pro-woman views and if she knew about them before agreeing to be cast as Professor Umbridge in the full-cast audiobook series of Harry Potter that's about to be released. Yes, that's a long sentence. But it completely changes the perspective of the reader by phrasing it as Rowling having a "pro-woman" stance instead of "anti-trans." 

Keira, bless her, responded with a laugh showing the absurdity and misplacement of the question, and graciously called people to figure out how to get along with one another because we are a diverse group of beliefs and opinions and mutual respect is important. I'm paraphrasing.

She's right. We will never move forward as a society if we cannot agree to disagree and move on from topics of contention.

But that reasonable response has resulted in a bit of a Keira Knightley witch-hunt and reinvigoration of the "boycott Rowling" crowd. Both of which are completely uncalled for and extremely dramatic, something that frustrates me as I grow older because drama is just so absurd.

But I did just think of something else that is bothering me.

Why Keira? Is it just because she was "to hand" in an interview? Or is it because she's the most well-known female in the audio cast (from my perspective)? Or . . . what? Because I see famous male names like Hugh Laurie, Matthew Macfadyen (now that's kind of funny that they're in the same audiobook series!), Kit Harrington, Simon Pegg, James McAvoy, and Riz Ahmed (maybe not everybody knows his work, but I do) in the cast but it doesn't seem that they were pressured the same way as Keira.

How is that okay? Now that I'm really thinking about it, I am quite upset that she was jumped like that, out of the blue, when it seems none of her male costars have had to put up with the same absurdity or endure the same online witchhunt. She was simply being diplomatic in her response! Or are these people only upset if someone doesn't voice their disdain for Rowling, not if they are acting in a Harry Potter production? I wouldn't be surprised if that was it. They're fine so long as the actor hates Rowling.

TikTokers and Redditors are not the majority of people. They're just not. Are they the most vocal, oh yes, but do they reflect the beliefs of every single person, absolutely not. So they really should just be viewed as the vocal 1% and treated as such. A flash-in-the-pan knee-jerk response of online rage isn't going to impact my love and admiration for Keira Knightley and her varying roles in the slightest. And I can guarantee you that she has a ton of fans IRL who will never know about this "controversy" and wouldn't care even if they did because they are not chronically online. What next? A call to boycott the PotC franchise? I don't think so. The rage echo chamber is getting old and it's showing how little the 1% actually spend amongst the rest of us.

Now, back to the actual reason for the Rowling question in the first place, the Harry Potter full-cast audio book series! It sounds amazing!

I look forward to intense pangs of hatred and loathing for Professor Umbridge that I know Keira's voice acting will deliver. And, wow, give me my Hugh Laurie as Dumbledore! He's an absolute fav of mine from waaaaaaay back in the 90s, yes, I am that old! I truly hope the full-cast audiobooks of Harry Potter live up to the hype!

Read More

The Social Media Paradox: How Critiquing TikTok Trends Fuels the Fire

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

Created using Canva

"It’s ironic: The louder we shout about toxic trends, the more oxygen we give them. In our quest to critique, we risk becoming unwitting megaphones for the very content we claim to oppose."



1. The Algorithm’s Unforgiving Math

Social media platforms thrive on engagement—any engagement. When YouTube commentary channels dissect TikTok trends (overconsumption, rage bait, exploitative family content), they inadvertently amplify the reach of those trends. Even disapproval signals relevance to algorithms, boosting visibility for creators and their controversial content. In my opinion: “The best way to stop the fire is to cut off the oxygen supply.”


  • The Attention Economy: Every view, comment, or critique feeds the machine. Creators profit from outrage, and platforms profit from division.

  • The “Critique Trap”: Well-intentioned criticism often introduces niche trends to broader audiences, sparking curiosity in viewers who’d never have encountered them otherwise.



2. The Rise of Meta-Commentary

YouTube’s “commentary on content” culture creates a self-perpetuating cycle. Creators analyze trends to condemn them, yet their videos become the trend—a hall of mirrors where outrage drives clicks. This mirrors broader cultural dynamics:


  • Vicarious Stress: Watching critiques of platforms you don’t use (for example, I don't have TikTok) can create “secondhand anxiety,” wasting emotional energy on distant dramas.

  • Moral Licensing Trap: Viewers may feel virtuous for “resisting” trends by watching critiques, yet still contribute to the ecosystem.



3. Breaking the Cycle: Practical Steps

A. Starve the Algorithms

  • Silence = Impact: Ignoring trends and their critics denies both the oxygen they crave. Mute keywords, block channels, and curate feeds to exclude meta-commentary.
  • Redirect Attention: Follow creators who focus on solutions (e.g., mindful consumption, creativity) rather than dissecting problems.

B. Reclaim Your Mental Space

  • Audit Your Consumption: Ask, “Does this content enrich me or drain me?” If it’s the latter, click “Not Interested.”
  • Channel Curiosity Productively: Replace trend-watching with hobbies, faith-based content, or skill-building (e.g., cooking, DIY projects).

C. Advocate Quietly

  • Model Alternatives: Share positive, life-giving content—art, family moments, service projects—to counterbalance cultural noise.
  • Teach Critical Thinking: For parents, discuss social media’s pitfalls proactively (e.g., “Why do you think this trend went viral?”) without directing kids to specific toxic content.


A Personal Reflection:
“I’ve deleted my ‘trend critique’ playlists. It’s freeing to realize I don’t need to be a cultural watchdog. My time is better spent creating, connecting, and cultivating peace than shouting into the void.”


Closing Challenge:
What if we treated toxic trends like a passing storm—acknowledging their existence but refusing to stand in the rain? The quieter we become, the less power they hold.

    Read More

    “How to Murder Your Wife” (1965): A Mixed Bag of Laughs and Cringe

    Wednesday, October 1, 2025

    Jack Lemmon shines as Stanley Ford, a lifelong bachelor cartoonist whose drunken antics and reluctant plunge into marriage drive this dark comedy. The film’s humor hinges on his physical comedy—think expanding waistlines from Italian cooking and lightbulb-electrocution mishaps. His habit of acting out comic strip scenes before drawing them adds genuine laughs, showcasing Lemmon’s genius.


    The Good: Vintage Lemmon

    • Physical comedy gold: Slapstick moments (like the infamous lightbulb scene) highlight Lemmon’s talent.
    • Creative flair: Reenacting comic strip scenarios blurs fiction and reality in clever, absurd ways.
    • Charming chemistry: Virna Lisi’s character softens Stanley’s edges, offering glimmers of genuine connection.

    The Dated: 1960s Gender Dynamics
    The film’s “battle of the sexes” premise hasn’t aged well:

    • Misogyny as punchlines: Women are reduced to objects (bachelor parties turn wakes for “lost freedom”) or manipulators.
    • Marriage as imprisonment: The mustache-growing rebellion feels tragic, not funny, in today’s context.
    • Scantily clad stereotypes: Lisi’s wardrobe choices prioritize male gaze over character depth.

    The Uncomfortable: Mutual Manipulation
    Both genders weaponize distrust:

    • Stanley’s friends celebrate freedom when weddings collapse.
    • Wives use emotional blackmail (no motorcycles, no mustache, no independence).
    • The title’s dark premise—fantasizing spousal murder—feels jarringly mean-spirited.

    Verdict: A Time Capsule, Not a Blueprint
    While How to Murder Your Wife offers laughs through Lemmon’s brilliance, its gender politics clash with modern values. It’s best viewed as a cultural artifact—a reminder of how far we’ve come (and how far we still need to go) in portraying mutual respect in relationships.

    Rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (for Lemmon) / ⭐️ (for messaging) 

    Read More

    The Christmas Tree Farm by Melody Carlson (2024)

    Monday, September 29, 2025

    As a longtime reader of Melody Carlson’s Christmas novels and YA works like her Secrets series, I approached The Christmas Tree Farm with high hopes. While Carlson’s signature storytelling charm shines in moments, this 2024 release ultimately left me wanting more.

    What Didn’t Click

    Character Development: The sisters’ constant bickering felt more juvenile than sibling-rivalry authentic, making their 30-something ages hard to reconcile.

    Plot Pacing: The story’s abrupt shifts between the tree farm’s challenges and the neighboring dirt bike park subplot created a disjointed rhythm.

    Relatability: Though the noisy neighbor premise holds potential for cozy conflict, the execution leaned heavily on situational tension over heartfelt connection.

    Silver Linings

    Carlson’s knack for creating festive small-town atmospheres remains intact, and the Christmas tree farm setting itself brims with untapped hygge potential. Longtime fans of her quick-read holiday style may still find moments to enjoy.

    Final Thoughts

    While this novella didn’t resonate with me personally—I’ll be passing my copy to a local Christian bookstore for others to discover—it reinforces how even beloved authors occasionally miss the mark. Here’s hoping Carlson’s next Christmas tale recaptures the warmth of her earlier works!

    Here's my page of Christmas Reads reviews.

    Read More

    Anxiety is a major player in Halloween Baking Championship Season 11

    Thursday, September 18, 2025


    We wait all year for the new season of Halloween Baking Championship, mostly to see what new theme they come up with and how John Henson plays into the story as the "killer." We also love watching these incredibly gifted bakers work their craft and create magic!

    Part of what makes the show work is the continuity. The placement of the set is the same, the baking stations are the same, the judging location is the same, how the judges enter is the same . . . you get what I'm saying. Yes, the set changes with the theme, but the "skeleton" of the show is always the same, so it feels warm and cozy and familiar, like you walked into Grandma's house, albeit a creepy version that's been given a makeover as a hotel, or a carnival, or a laboratory, or (my personal favorite) a summer camp.

    Oh my goodness, gracious, the 11th season is going to be a fail. I can tell because it is already filmed and Food Network cannot fix what has been done after the fact.

    Food Network, here's where you went wrong:
    • You chose mediocre bakers who don't know how to save a warm cake or bake a pie crust that won't melt, for I'm assuming dramatic purposes.
    • You chose to downsize the set so it feels like we're in a cracker box.
    • You chose to set up the baking stations in one long uniform line where literally nobody has any elbow room or personal baking space to speak of.
    • You chose to bring in bakers with major Main Character energy.
    • You chose, for whatever reason, to not have an actual story for the Haunted House, one that would bring out John Henson's magnificent talent for the macabre and creepy by casting him as the "villain."
    • You chose to shop at Spirit Halloween for the judge's costumes.
    • You chose to have all the bakers present in their little balcony for the judging of one another so we can hear their whispering and conversation about how the judging went.
    • And above all, you chose to have only 13 bakes, 6 of which were baked by the 3 worst bakers of the episode, so no more The Thriller and The Killer challenges.
    I'm sorry, what?

    Here are some positives that haven't changed:
    • John Henson is still John Henson, albeit with nothing to do, but at least he's there.
    • It's still the same 3 judges, so that's also something because I'm super used to them.
    • The set dressing is cool as a Haunted House.
    • I do think there are a few talented bakers like Camille and Nina, but I can't say for sure because we weren't allowed to focus on the good bakes.
    I'm sad to say, that's it for the positives.

    Everything was fine until Melanie laid down by her oven to "take a moment" clutching her "emotional support stirring spoon." Girl, you forgot the sugar in your cake! You have literally 90 minutes left! Bake it again and throw it in the blast chiller! Don't lay down with a panic attack!

    I say everything was fine, but several of these contestants were literally unnerved by John Henson in ways I haven't seen before and that was prior to Melanie's little meltdown. John's fun and hilarious and a prankster! He's not actually scary, and being too nervous to even talk to him about what you're making is just absolutely ridiculous.

    One other major issue is the judges are being swayed by the presence of all the contestants and by the "personal" stories of the bakers, i.e. Melanie. She should not be there. She is not a competent baker in a competition setting. She was saved solely on account of her personal story. If she'd had to bake in the bottom 3, she would have been gone.

    I'm sorry, no. I get that you care, judges. But please, Zac, Carla, and Stephanie, do your jobs properly and judge based on the quality of the bakes, not on the personal trauma of the bakers.

    And let's not even talk about Justin "saving" whoever was going to be eliminated by "volunteering as tribute." That's not how this works, bro. People have chosen to leave in previous seasons and they will still have an elimination in that episode. Justin choosing to die on his sword and leave should not have actually saved one of the 3 worst bakers. And, wait, did you actually interrupt John Henson!? I say again, I'm sorry, what?

    This is, by far, the worst batch of bakers I have seen in the now 11 seasons of the show that I have watched. This includes the pre-Henson seasons! I'm disappointed because I love Halloween Baking Championship. I love the format, the judges, the host, just everything. And in previous years, I have really loved the bakers. But I did not sign on for a season of high-level anxiety and tears and drama and meltdowns. Guys, it's a baking show! It's not that serious! I cannot believe HBC has devolved to this extent.

    Welcome to the 11th season of Halloween Baking Championship!


    Read More

    Why I’m Backing Lady Agatha Speaks Her Mind — A Spiceless Romantasy Delight

    Wednesday, September 17, 2025

     


    If you love romantasy but prefer your stories spiceless, I’ve found a gem you won’t want to miss: Lady Agatha Speaks Her Mind by Elisabeth Aimee Brown. I just backed the Kickstarter, and I’m genuinely thrilled about this project.

    This story promises all the charm of a fairy tale with the wit and whimsy of the Ella Enchanted movie adaptation—one of my all-time favorites. It sounds clean, clever, and full of heart. I had the chance to read the sample chapter, and I was laughing out loud. Lady Agatha is a heroine with a voice, and I can’t wait to hear more of it.

    The campaign runs until September 18, so there’s not much time left to join in. If you’ve been longing for a romantasy that’s rich in story and light on spice, this might be the one to support. Plus, there’s something special about helping bring a story like this into the world.

    You can check out the Kickstarter here: Lady Agatha Speaks Her Mind

    Let’s help Lady Agatha speak her mind—and maybe laugh a little along the way.

    Read More

    Why I Backed Turnabout Is Fair Cosplay — And Why You Might Want To, Too

    Tuesday, September 16, 2025

     


    If you love Shakespeare, sweet romantic comedies, and stories that sparkle without the spice, Turnabout Is Fair Cosplay might be your next favorite read — and it needs your help to come to life!

    Amy Trent’s upcoming novel is a no-spice, enemies-to-lovers rom-com inspired by Much Ado About Nothing, set in sunny La Jolla, California. It features cosplay, witty banter, and a heroine who’s prickly but lovable — think Beatrice with a cactus collection. The story promises all the swoon-worthy tension and clever repartee of Shakespeare’s original, but with a modern twist and zero steam.

    As a fan of clean romance and classic literature, I was instantly drawn to this project. It’s refreshing to see a contemporary love story that celebrates emotional depth, humor, and character growth without relying on explicit content. Plus, the cosplay angle adds a fun, nerdy layer that makes it stand out.

    I read the first chapter, which is available for free right here, and I absolutely loved it! The voice is sharp, funny, and full of heart — exactly what I hoped for.

    ⚠️ The campaign ends September 18, 2025 — just two days from now! If this sounds like your kind of story, don’t wait — hop on it while you can!

    👉 Check out the campaign here

    Read More

    Sidney Poitier: A Patch of Blue in a Clouded World

    How do you describe a man who stood beside Martin Luther King Jr. during the “I Have a Dream” speech? Who was often the only Black person on set, carrying the weight of representation for millions? Sidney Poitier wasn’t just an actor—he was a quiet revolution.

    Hollywood has long dazzled audiences, but when A Patch of Blue was released in 1965, Southern theaters cut the interracial kiss between Poitier and Elizabeth Hartman. The world was shifting, but not fast enough.

    If Poitier is new to you, let me introduce him through the film that won my heart. I first saw A Patch of Blue in my early twenties, and it never left me.

    Selina, a blind young woman raised by a violent, racist mother and grandfather, lives in poverty and isolation. Her days are spent stringing beads in the park—her only job, her only escape. One day, she spills her bead box into the grass. As she scrambles to collect them, her hands meet those of a stranger: Gordon, played by Poitier. He helps her, speaks kindly, and sees her—not as a burden, but as a person.

    Gordon teaches Selina that she can learn to dial a phone, walk to the park on her own, even read. He tells her she’s beautiful. Desirable. Capable. For the first time, someone cracks open a window in her dark world and lets in a patch of blue sky.

    That’s why I love this film. It’s a story of hope. Selina’s life is bleak, but one act of compassion changes everything. And it’s Poitier at his finest—dignified, empathetic, quietly powerful. Gordon is a middle-class professional who sees past race and class to offer kindness. Even his own brother questions the relationship, but Gordon remains steadfast.

    Race is central to the story, and Poitier’s performance handles it with grace. Though he didn’t win an award for this role, he deserved one. His Oscar for Lilies of the Field was historic, but A Patch of Blue is just as moving.

    Poitier once said:

    “I never had an occasion to question color, therefore, I only saw myself as what I was... a human being.”

    That’s the heart of his legacy. A pebble tossed into a lake creates ripples that stretch far beyond the point of impact. Sidney Poitier was one of those pebbles—his presence, his performances, his dignity—sending waves of change through generations.

    Note: This article was originally published on Femnista, a webzine that no longer exists, under the title To Sidney, with Love. For other articles that I wrote and published, please visit the Femnista Writings section of my blog. I have edited the article for clarity, but the heart of my original article shines through.

    Read More

    Foods We Tried in Galaxy's Edge + Nighttime Gathering Dining Package Experience

    Wednesday, August 27, 2025

    Let me preface this by saying that I know what they are trying to do in Galaxy's Edge foodwise. They're trying to make things seem exotic and a little peculiar, like you wouldn't find certain things "on earth." I absolutely commend the attempt. With that said, almost all of the drinks (non-alcoholic since we don't drink alcohol) were a no-go with us, which is sort of a shame, but oh well.

    Non-Alcoholic Drinks in Galaxy's Edge


    Cold Brew Black Caf - You know how something sounds better in theory than it actually tastes? That was this. Purchased in Docking Bay 7 for $7.79, I don't know what I was expecting, but I didn't expect to be crunching Cocoa Puffs along with ice cubes in my coffee drink. Was it interesting to look at, yes? But honestly I would have preferred a regular iced coffee with cream and swirls of chocolate and some luster dust instead of the chocolate cereal that served almost no purpose other than to be different.

    Photo Credit: Disneyland

    Blue Milk - Purchased at the Milk Stand, this one was my sister's drink. It was, indeed, blue, but she found it overly sweet, and I think she was expecting something more exciting flavor-wise than what she said might be blue raspberry. We could be wrong about the flavor, though. What we both really balked at was the price tag of $8.99 for maybe 10 ounces of a drink. Those cups are pretty small for the price. She was glad she tried it once but by her own admission, she wouldn't buy one again.

    Photo Credit: Wookieepedia (Smartguy74)

    Green Milk with Red Lichen Paddy Frog Eggs - Also purchased at the Milk Stand, this one was mine, also at a very high price tag of $9.49. I love boba and popping spheres, so having cherry popping spheres with actually pretty fun, and I enjoyed the unique texture of the pineapple. So this one was really good, although it's not on the menu now so I'm not sure if it was just a super limited edition drink. Anyway, I liked it, but not the price, again, for something that is maybe 10 ounces and has zero alcohol.

    Cotton Candy Topped Soda - It is exactly as it sounds. I think this is just offered as part of the Nighttime Gathering Dining package right now, and we both tried it on a whim with that package. While it was super fun to look at, topping an already super sweet drink with cotton candy absolutely guarantees a sugar high. I only drank about half of my drink because it was just entirely too sweet with the cotton candy dissolving into the soda. It has sort of a galaxy aesthetic, but I would prefer something a bit more functional.

    Lunch and Snack Items in Galaxy's Edge


    Endorian Fried Chicken Tip-Yip - Purchased at Docking Bay 7, this was a fried chicken meal with broccolini and macaroni and cheese (we substituted for this). Priced at $15.49, I mean, for Galaxy's Edge it was a "reasonable price." At that point in the day, we were both super hungry so we just needed to eat without having to leave Galaxy's Edge. It was nothing spectacular, but it was energy and that's what we needed.

    Photo Credit: Wookieepedia (Smartguy74)

    Polystarch Puffbread - This was a snack at the Milk Stand, and it was actually quite yummy. Because of the steep price tag, we only bought one and shared it. It is not a big pastry, so for the $7.29, it wasn't really a good value. I hear tell it was once $5.99 and that makes more sense so talk about some major inflation! But it was probably my favorite thing that I ate in Galaxy's Edge, so I'll give it that.

    Nighttime Gathering Dining Package Experience

    Did this feel exclusive? Yes, so having a special meal, getting a specialty pin for the experience, having professional photos taken on a special balcony, and having a reserved standing space for the Shadows of Memory: A Skywalker Saga projection show on the spires of Galaxy's Edge does feel very exclusive. I'll go into the actual projection show and such in a later post, this will just cover the foods.

    HOWEVER, the $89 price tag per person is absurdly steep and was not worth the price of admission, at least for us. Next time, we'll just stand with everybody else near the Millennium Falcon and crane our necks upwards.

    I think if the meal itself had been different, as in, an actual meal instead of a bento, then it might have felt like we were getting the value for the cost. I like me a good bento, but it did sort of lower the value of the experience a bit, not because the food wasn't decent, but because it felt cheap, being plated in a space-age experience bento box.


      


    As for the food, the best part of the meal for me was the Wonton citrus-ginger chicken salad taco. That was quite delicious. It was disappointing that they only give you one of the tacos but do give you three of the quite heavy Cheeseburger croquettes. For me, I would have preferred the reverse. The goat cheese spread was delicious with the pita bread chips, loved that. Otherwise the meat and cheese section was just, average, nothing special. And, again, the theme of the cereal was carried through to the desserts. There was a chocolate eclair with cocoa puffs and, I think it was a profiterole. They were fine, relatively tasty, but the whole cereal thing just doesn't work for me.

    My Final Thoughts

    For me and my sister, in our opinion, the food in Galaxy's Edge was not worth the cost. It was not a good value for us overall, and we would likely not eat in that part of Disneyland again.

    Our suggestions for improvement would be to not try so hard. Quality over space-age experience would be a really good start. And, let's be honest, the pricing is over-the-top. Counting the Nighttime Gathering experience, the food and drink cost us $247.53 in Galaxy's Edge, and let's be honest now, we were being pretty frugal with our choices. There were only 2 of us. I hate to think how much a family of 4 would spend especially if you throw in the occasional alcoholic drink.

    Anyway, this was just our experience. If Galaxy's Edge food is your jam, that's awesome. Of everything, I would try the Green Milk with Red Lichen Paddy Frog Eggs again and I think my sister might like that one too.

    Photo Credit: Me unless stated otherwise

    Read More

    Ride Recap in Star Wars Galaxy's Edge in Disneyland

    Wednesday, August 20, 2025

    We went, we saw, we conquered, we had an amazing trip to Disneyland!

    I'm going to do my recap posts sort of backwards, starting with the last day first.

    Our final day was spent primarily in Galaxy's Edge and I have to give kudos to Disney's imagineers at creating such an immersive experience. Literally, it feels like you are in Star Wars, which was sort of what I was expecting, but not to that level.

    We'll cover the Galaxy's Edge rides with this post.

      

    Yes, we paid for lightning lane for Rise of the Resistance because neither of us wanted to wait 1-2 hours in line for a ride. We're just not those people. With that being said, this is a pretty cool ride, as immersive as Galaxy's Edge itself. You are involved in the story. You're captured by the First Order, interrogated, rescued, all the things. The special effects are pretty epic too, especially one drop in particular that neither of us was expecting, so that was thrilling!

      

    What was hilarious was that the ride went down that morning, something that seems to happen with decent regularity. I get it, that ride is complicated, and it would be super easy for things to go wrong. So, nobody was in line for lightning lane (can't speak for the regular line). We just happened to be there at almost the exact second the ride came back up. So we dashed through with our lightning lane passes and we literally had an entire transport to ourselves, JUST THE TWO OF US! That was crazy! And it made the experience that much more immersive, especially considering this was our first time on the ride!

      

    Disney put a lot of money and effort into that ride, and I give them absolute props for what they created. We both loved it and will definitely ride it again on our next trip.

    Next up is Smuggler's Run, which we both thoroughly enjoyed as well. We were with a sweet little family of 4, and the main concept of the ride is that you are in control of the Millennium Falcon. Each of you is given a job to do with the buttons, knobs, switches in the cabin to make sure the Falcon flies properly. And you get a rating at the end for accuracy. Mine was about 60% accuracy with the buttons, so considering I had no idea what I was doing, that was pretty awesome.

    My favorite part wasn't necessarily the ride, but the sense of being inside the Millennium Falcon. I'm old school Star Wars, so for me, anything from the OT is going to be a hit. It was fun feeling like you were walking where Han and Chewie had walked.

    I do wish the ride was designed in a way that allowed you to focus on the experience and not on pushing buttons or flipping switches to keep the Falcon from crashing. I feel like I was looking at the console for flashing buttons more than I was focusing on the actual experience. That may just be because this was our first and only time so far on the ride, so I may not have the same response next time.

    Of the two rides, because I am old school, I did personally enjoy Smuggler's Run more than Rise of the Resistance. Kylo Ren was never my jam so to have an entire ride be First Order centric was a bit over the top for me, but still, they were both amazing, and I will gladly go on both again. It just depends, I think, on where riders are in their personal Star Wars fandom journey as to which ride they will enjoy more.

    A brief mention is that Galaxy's Edge does need more rides. Just having two rides there is not enough for the enormity of that part of the park, so I hope that a few more rides will be added. And for me and mine, we would love a ride that is Mandalorian themed. That would be epic, in the best way!

    Future Galaxy's Edge posts will cover the Bounty Hunter magicband+ game, the Shadows of Memory Skywalker Saga light show, the lightsaber build experience, Character experiences, photo ops, and more.

    Photo Disclaimer: All photos, unless otherwise stated, have been taken by either me or my sister. I will be hiding our faces when sharing photos where our faces are seen.

    Read More