![]() |
Photo Credit: Davelandweb |
![]() |
Photo Credit: Davelandweb |
![]() |
Photo Credit: Davelandweb |
![]() |
Photo Credit: Davelandweb |
![]() |
Felicity Jones as Jyn Erso from Rogue One: A Star Wars Story (2016) |
All right, people—let’s talk briefly about Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.
I get it. Star Wars is now this sprawling universe filled with all kinds of characters and stories. But let’s be honest—most of these stories don’t really align with each other. Rogue One and the so-called “hit” series Andor (and yes, I’m using “hit” loosely here) feel like they exist in completely different realities.
To me, Andor is like the Star Trek reboot movies—a total schism from the original franchise. Sure, people love them, but they don’t fit. And that’s fine, I guess. It happened. It’s too late to undo it—for both Star Wars and Star Trek.
But here’s where things get different: with Andor, I’ve noticed a complete lack of respect for what came before—from both fans and the director. Love Andor all you want. If you’re Tony Gilroy, be proud of the series you created. If you’re a fan, obsess over it to your heart’s content. No one’s stopping you.
Because this is my opinion blog, meaning my personal opinion, I require polite discourse. You have been invited to my table, in my home, which I own. Behave accordingly. If you harass me in any way, I will delete your comment.
What’s not okay is the way some people are actively trying to diminish the value of Rogue One within the Star Wars franchise.
I was there—an adult—when Rogue One hit theaters nine years ago. It was a revelation. Nothing that good had come out of Star Wars since the original trilogy. The film was praised for its gritty, emotional story and stellar performances. Felicity Jones brought real depth to Jyn Erso, and Diego Luna was excellent as Cassian Andor.
Those are facts. You can’t rewrite them.
And here’s the thing: dark and depressing doesn’t automatically equal “gritty.” If you’re into a show about politics and fascism (gee, wonder why that’s on everyone’s mind right now?), go for it. But I have issues with Andor not just because of its bleak tone, but because it rewrites Cassian’s backstory. They aged him up. They made him a liar in Rogue One. They even changed his home planet. Why?
That kind of revisionism is unacceptable. And honestly, I get strong narcissist vibes from Tony Gilroy, so maybe it makes sense—he just did what he wanted. Maybe Andor is good. But I’ll never know, because the attitude of the director and the fanbase completely turned me off. And once that happens, there’s no going back.
What I do know is this: Rogue One is not, and never will be, “the worst episode of Andor,” no matter what some snarky fans claim. Instead, as I see it, Andor is that weird offshoot in its own corner, like those Star Trek reboots, that just doens't fit with the story and written canon.
Rogue One isn’t Cassian’s story.
It’s Jyn Erso’s story. It’s about her family and their role in the creation—and destruction—of the first Death Star. Real fans of the original Star Wars saga see Rogue One as a powerful, worthy addition. This is Felicity Jones’ movie. Diego Luna just happened to be in it. And Jyn Erso is one of the strongest female leads in the franchise.
It’s a shame Tony Gilroy, who also worked on Rogue One which just baffles me, chose to undermine something great just to boost his own series and rewrite canon. Explain to me why he is attempting to erase Jyn Erso, a brilliant female lead? And it's almost worse of a shame that Disney is attempting to rewrite history by the new Rogue One poster on Disney+ featuring Cassian first.
The below is what the actual original poster from 2016 looks like, with Jyn correctly as the lead.
Disney needs to take a hard look at how it manages continuity. They were in charge when Rogue One was made, and they’re still in charge now. The disconnect between Rogue One and Andor is on them. They should’ve stopped Tony Gilroy before he even picked up his red pen.
Because this is my opinion blog, meaning my personal opinion, I require polite discourse. You have been invited to my table, in my home, which I own. Behave accordingly. If you harass me in any way, I will delete your comment.
I should have known better than to buy something just because it’s hyped up. Maybe it’s just the Orange Cream soda flavor—but wow, yuck. It has this sharp, acidic kick that lingers in your mouth, followed by a sickeningly sweet aftertaste.
After finally reading the can (which I definitely should have done first), I realized the acidic bite comes from apple cider vinegar—like in Kombucha, another vinegar-based drink I’m not a fan of. And that overly sweet aftertaste? Stevia. Another hard pass for me.
I get it—this soda is supposed to be “healthy,” packed with prebiotics and other good-for-you ingredients. That’s great in theory, but if it tastes awful, I’m not going to force myself to drink it. I don’t eat Brussels sprouts for the same reason!
Maybe this kind of drink works for some people, but if you’re already happy with diet soda or zero-sugar options, I say stick with those. At least they taste decent—at least, according to my taste buds. Add prebiotics another way to your diet.
Photo Credit: Me |
![]() |
Photo Credit: WDW Magazine |
![]() |
Photo Credit: Trip Advisor |
See this Fact Check article regarding false and misleading claims being made about Ukraine.
Below are some of the most common false claims about Ukraine that have been disproven by simple fact checking and are listed on the above website.
![]() |
My dresser of Austen decor, a trunk that's part of the collection, and the Jane Austen book boxes. |
Ok, so if I found out about this after the fact, I would be super upset, which is why I'm sharing about the collection while there might still be some in stock at your closest Michaels store and online!
As any self-respecting Jane Austen fan knows, this year is Jane Austen's 250th birthday, and while I cannot be in England this December for all of the amazingly fabulous celebrations that will be taking place, I can actually revere her in other ways, including my decor.
I've loved Austen since my teen years when my father, of all people, introduced me to her work through the Olivier/Garson film adaptation of Pride & Prejudice (read my rave review)! It was the start of an eternal friendship with the great authoress which even includes one random theatrical experience playing Charlotte Lucas in a local musical back in 2012 (crazy to think of it being so long ago!).
But enough of my reminiscing, let me return to the Jane Austen collection at Michaels!
Here, my friends, you can find the English Romance collection of decor options, but really, it is Austen inspired and you'll see why in a second.
Jane Austen Wall Art |
Gold Bird Tabletop Decor |
Floral Wall Cubby |
I've been reading in The Gospel of St. Mark lately and the topic of familiarity breeding contempt crops up when, in Chapter 6:1-6, Jesus returns to his hometown. The entire time Jesus is "home," everyone is questioning his authority. They "know" him too well according to their own understanding of who Jesus is. He will never be more than Mary's son, other than a carpenter, other than a member of the community who they watched grow up. They do not believe he is capable of miracles or is equipped to teach in the synagogue because there is no way he could be.
Verse 3 says that "they took offense at him" and in verse 4 Jesus says "'Only in his hometown, among his relatives and in his own house is a prophet without honor.'"
They had contempt for Jesus and diminished him from his proper status as prophet, and yes, God's son, but He wasn't allowing His identity a the Son of God to be publicly proclaimed at this point in His ministry. I actually do get this concept a lot. If I suddenly professed a vocation that nobody suspected before, my friends, family, and colleagues would wonder what in the world was going on and whether I needed psychiatric help. I get it. Change comes as a shock to the people in our lives who are accustomed to a person being one thing.
And verse 5 says "He (Jesus) could not do any miracles there, except lay his hands on a few sick people and heal them."
I love how faith plays a role in Jesus working miracles. This verse does not imply that Jesus was limited in terms of ability although some would wrongly interpret it that way, but it does make clear that He will perform miracles only where there is that faith as small as a mustard seed. His neighbors really missed out on a lot by their lack of willingness to believe in Him. There were people in that town who would have benefited from Jesus' healing touch if they had just reached out in faith, but that wasn't happening. Jesus does not force Himself on people who are unwilling to believe. He is a respecter of free will, which is totally a double-edged sword. In free will, people have the freedom to choose, but it also means they have the freedom to choose. And if they don't choose Christ, as He is, He's not going to force the issue.
Imagine those few sick people who were healed though! What broke through to them? Were they new to the community or was it something Jesus said that really shifted their perception from the familiar to the unknown? I don't know, but I love that even here, in a place where so few people believed, there were still some who put their faith in Jesus.
Finally, in verse 6 it says "And He (Jesus) was amazed at their lack of faith."
I don't believe for one minute that God didn't know these people would be lacking in faith, but I also don't pretend to know in what way Jesus was amazed at their lack of faith. Disappointment would imply that He had expectations, which He didn't have. He wasn't surprised either. There is such a lack of understanding of who Jesus is that the lack of faith is amazing, but not in a positive way. I don't know. I think the closest I've come to understanding is simply Jesus' amazement at how hard it is for those who should know Him well to trust and have faith in Him. I read something similar in this article on the Catholic Exchange and it makes the most sense to me, trying to explain something that feels inexplicable.
My personal takeaway is that I don't want to be the community in Nazareth who thought they knew Jesus so well that they couldn't see Him as the Christ. And the only way to avoid that happening is by practicing faith in Jesus.
![]() |
from Tenor |
There's been a bizarre increase of Right-Wing Cancel Culture, and I don't mean cancel culture against the opposing viewpoint, I mean cancel culture against what should technically be our own people.
What I'm talking about is The Daily Wire Brett Cooper/Reagan Conrad controversy for The Comments Section YouTube channel. Brett is no longer with DW, has her own EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL YT channel now, and Reagan is the new host for the DW's channel The Comments Section. Well, turns out, this was an incredibly controversial event. And instead of diehard Brettbros (I believe her fans call themselves that) peacefully transitioning to Brett's new channel, they are now doing the cancel culture thing of literally flooding all of Reagan's videos with bullying comments.
Now, I have nothing against Brett. But I'm 41 and far too old for this type of petty behavior. There is no call for there to be hundreds of comments on each of Reagan's videos literally lambasting her, hating on the DW, chanting for the downfall of the channel, etc. I am there for the content. When Brett was the host I was still there just for the content. I do not care who provides the information to me, I am loyal to the premise of the channel itself.
I do not need Brett's little anti-fan army reminding me on every single of Reagan's videos that Brett has her own channel, that her 1st, 2nd, blah blah episode are up. I KNOW! Do they think I've buried my head in the sand and have no clue what's been going on!? If I wanted to follow Brett and watch her content I would do so.
I also happen to be an extremely stubborn person. The more somebody pushes buttons to manipulate me into doing something or attempts to cause the downfall of someone, the angrier I am going to become and less likely it is I that I will actually do what you want.
![]() |
from Pinterest |
Cancel culture is an ugly thing. I regret participating back with the whole anti-Star Wars rant related to Gina Carano that WENT ABSOLUTELY NOWHERE. It's ugly when you try to silence opposing viewpoints because we should be better than our opponents and not do to them what they have done to us. But it is absolutely reprehensible for people who share the SAME BASIC PRINCIPLES to attempt to cancel someone simply because they didn't like what went down.
Hopefully I'm wrong and these people are just trolls. But I have an awful feeling that I'm right. I wish Brett well. I hope she has a great amount of success. But I will watch who I want to watch and right now, that person isn't her. Because Reagan and the DW have proven to be the "better person" in this whole situation by simply carrying on and not addressing the bullies. That takes a lot of guts and I applaud them for continuing to push out relevant content and not stooping to the level of the mudslinging Brettbros.